GnPapers fully manages the editorial workflow of scientific journals, providing crucial information to the editorial team so they can make transparent and informed decisions about approving or rejecting an article.
From article submission to reviewer evaluation, the system is designed with simplicity and clarity in mind, featuring instructions at every step.
When the editor returns an article for revision, a new version of the article is created, generating a history and making it easier for reviewers and editors to check whether the author's recommendations have been implemented.
Strategic information is crucial for any manager. GnPapers provides various essential data to editors, allowing for comparisons between different periods.
Additionally, journals indexed in SciELO need to present periodic reports on productivity. All the requested data is currently provided by the system.
All processes have defined deadlines that change as the article progresses through the workflow. The editor can modify the predefined deadlines or exceptionally set a different deadline for a specific user on an article.
Monitor comparative graphs that illustrate deadline compliance by system processes, such as receiving an article, assigning reviewers, evaluating, checking a review form, etc.
Customize fields, forms, notification messages, and restrictions (such as word limits for abstracts, number of authors, and more).
All system processes generate notification emails to the responsible party for follow-up. This ensures that everyone involved with the article stays informed about deadlines and the progress of each stage.
Each submitted article can have an assigned editor who will be responsible for distributing it to reviewers and monitoring the peer review process. This includes the ability to assign, change, send reminder messages, and remove reviewers.
The responsible editor can be a user with the "Editor" access level, which allows viewing all articles in the system, or "Associate Editor," which permits viewing only the articles assigned to that user.
There are two ways to configure the autonomy of an Associate Editor when assigned to an article:
Allows reviewers and editors to comment on different paragraphs of the article, making the correction process much richer and more precise. The author can respond to each review criterion, providing greater transparency by indicating whether a correction has been made or justifying why it was not made.
We have a team ready to understand your needs and exceed your expectations.
